Better Living Through Criticism: How to Think about Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth

Better Living Through Criticism How to Think about Art Pleasure Beauty and Truth The New York Times film critic shows why we need criticism now than everFew could explain let alone seek out a career in criticism Yet what A O Scott shows in Better Living Through Criticism is that

  • Title: Better Living Through Criticism: How to Think about Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth
  • Author: A.O. Scott
  • ISBN: 9781594204838
  • Page: 217
  • Format: Hardcover
  • The New York Times film critic shows why we need criticism now than everFew could explain, let alone seek out, a career in criticism Yet what A.O Scott shows in Better Living Through Criticism is that we are, in fact, all critics because critical thinking informs almost every aspect of artistic creation, of civil action, of interpersonal life With penetrating insiThe New York Times film critic shows why we need criticism now than everFew could explain, let alone seek out, a career in criticism Yet what A.O Scott shows in Better Living Through Criticism is that we are, in fact, all critics because critical thinking informs almost every aspect of artistic creation, of civil action, of interpersonal life With penetrating insight and warm humor, Scott shows that while individual critics himself included can make mistakes and find flaws where they shouldn t, criticism as a discipline is one of the noblest, most creative, and urgent activities of modern existence.Using his own film criticism as a starting point everything from his infamous dismissal of the international blockbuster The Avengers to his intense affection for Pixar s animated Ratatouille Scott expands outward, easily guiding readers through the complexities of Rilke and Shelley, the origins of Chuck Berry and the Rolling Stones, the power of Marina Abramovich and Ode on a Grecian Urn Drawing on the long tradition of criticism from Aristotle to Susan Sontag, Scott shows that real criticism was and always will be the breath of fresh air that allows true creativity to thrive The time for criticism is always now, Scott explains, because the imperative to think clearly, to insist on the necessary balance of reason and passion, never goes away.

    One thought on “Better Living Through Criticism: How to Think about Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth”

    1. I read this for some hours until I toppled sideways slowly and crumpled to the floor, where they found me still breathing, but only just. I write this from a private room, tubes going into various parts. They say I will make a full recovery. They say it was a good thing I didn’t make it past page 215. There’s a woman in the next room been there for three weeks now, she read the whole thing. She hasn't said a word yet. Her family say they will be consulting their lawyers. But I don’t think [...]

    2. Reading Better Living Through Criticism gave me exactly the same cramped and unpleasant feeling that I got from reading Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion: I wanted serious inquiry and instead felt pummeled and bullied into a corner by poorly argued dogma.At times Scott begins his argument about the uses of criticism with a false axiomatic principle--usually a belief that I don't ascribe to, but that Scott says I do ("everyone knows that critics are failed artists, and let me tell you why you're [...]

    3. I am predisposed to like any book that references Teju Cole's Open City, Philip Larkin, All About Eve, and the snark vs. smarm debate with intelligence and insight, but the delight of this book is that Scott takes both his voice and argument to places that I didn't expect. Even while retreading, a gleefulness animates his prose and rhetoric and makes his general enterprise feel novel.I laughed out loud dozens of times, sometimes out of surprise (the self-interviews are hilarious), sometimes out [...]

    4. Better Living Through Criticism and a Strawberry Enema. ~~ NYTs AO Scott is the worst writer and most unbearable film critic squirting his juvenile "thoughts" on the market today. The ultimate in b.s. and boring pretention. Sniff his title ! Why not Better Homes & Gardens ? In sum, he isunreadable.

    5. This book of philosophical essays by New York Times movie critic AO Scott was hugely disappointing, and not even worth a full write-up at my main arts center's blog. For while I'm a big fan of Scott's insightful essays for the newspaper, and was hoping that in this book he was going to go into more detail about how he goes about the business of actually writing them, it's instead one of those books where he traipses across the entire human history of critical thought and then says, "Look at this [...]

    6. Two weeks ago, I read until page 117. I haven't picked up the book since, and I haven't been tempted to. I'm left with two main impressions: first, there are occasional moments of real insight. Some come at the end of meandering paragraphs, and they feel like asides. A very few feel like deliberate arguments Scott makes. Here's a good one:It may seem as if I am enclosing art (along with criticism) in a familiar corral of self-reference, an airless theoretical space in which poets write to, about [...]

    7. Here I am, writing a critical review about a book about criticism. And someone could (if so inclined and so bored) write a critical review about my critical review about a book about criticism. This Sisyphean effort to find the final word on any piece of human ingenuity or creativity is why Scott writes this book in the first place -- criticism, he argues, is the second-born twin of our inherent human condition, entering the world mere minutes after the first-born of the creative act. It is both [...]

    8. I read the pre-release of this book with great interest; given the nature of this blog. An absolution, designed to simultaneously prove his "bona fides" to criticize shitty movies like the Avengers as corporate schlock, while also demonstrating that criticism is a worthy and worthwhile endeavor, Scott's book largely succeeds. [Author's Note:This review is nerdy]AO, you shall find no argument here with this critic (seeking better living). Scott's philosophical treatise on the nature and necessity [...]

    9. Really a 2.5. A survey of the philosophy of criticism. But I was left cold deciphering what he thinks about his profession. Criticism is thinking? Criticism is art? Is it? Yes? No? So many???? So abstract. To be fair, I don't mind abstraction, but I felt the argument (ironically enough) was weak. Hedge, duck, etc.

    10. Critics have it rough right now. Those at major old media institutions are seeing their employers scrambling for revenue, aggregators are diluting their individual influence, and artists of all mediums continue to skewer them, especially when they get lambasted by the critical establishment. As a blogger with a Lilliputian viewer count (especially when you take away the Russian referral spambots) who generally just doesn't review books I dislike, I'm largely shielded from/oblivious to such probl [...]

    11. themaineedge/style/forThe nature of the critic is to unpack the underpinnings of artistic endeavor. Love them or hate them, critics perform a vital service in the creative continuum, deconstructing movies/albums/books/plays down to their requisite pieces and casting the bones in an effort to call forth larger cultural themes and ideas.Some choose to do this by way of unrelenting pessimism, focusing on the negative aspects of a piece of work in order to exert a kind of creative enforcement. Other [...]

    12. Erudite and meticulous, Better Living Through Criticism would make an excellent textbook for the opening weeks of an undergraduate course on the history of criticism. Scott's work succeeds as a primer on the views on the art and science of criticism expounded by Pope and Arnold and Wordsworth that is eventually drawn forward to the present day and the role the critic can play in the age of digital media. But where it falters is as a general interest nonfiction text in its own right. It's dry, it [...]

    13. To be fair I didn't finish it so I'm not sure how I'm allowed to rate it. But it's due back at the library (today!) and quite frankly I haven't picked it up for close to a week. I was going along okay with it. It made me think a bit and I liked that. But I did do that "hmmm, how many pages have I got to go?" thing a little too often. I kept going onto the other book I've got going and I kept "meaning" to finish up A.O.'s tome. Soon. Yeah right.It's not that I didn't find the ideas interesting. S [...]

    14. One of my favorite things about A.O. Scott's film reviews is that they're so unpretentious. You can read his thoughts on some obscure Romanian film, and it'll still make sense, whether you even knew the Romanian New Wave was a thing before you started the review or not. This book is sadly not quite that. There's a lot of long-winded explanations of Plato, Henry James, Immanuel Kant, and other tired literary sources. This is a very short book (just 270 pages), but, because of Scott's detours, it' [...]

    15. For the man who mistook Marie Antoinette for the French Revolution I give him the pitchfork and then the axe.

    16. There is an intention that I don’t quite grasp denoted by the subtitle How to think about Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth. As I begin to write about Better Living Through Criticism: How to Think About Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth, I’m looking at a blank page—completely blank, eschewing my standard cheat-sheet of transcription that jump-starts my fingers—because I am not going to use any pull-quotes this time. At least, I intend not to, though after having finished writing and return [...]

    17. Why do we still need critics?That is the question. Well, because we will need to try something new, and we won't know where to start.We live with relativism, pluralism, Yelp, and you, darling . Some will make the argument that critics are obsolete since no one can know what will actually work for you. They say some other things, too. Here's the answer I got: If you want more of what you like, the argument holds: you can choose yourself, try recommendation engines, ask your friends, look at the [...]

    18. How is this for irony, rating a book that is about criticism.New York Times critic A.O. Scott dissects the art, the act and the overall being of a critic and why they exist at all. One could say we are all critics as we consume culture and veer towards what we like and veer away from things we don't.Scott seems to be battling himself in these pages, always questioning why this job exists in the first place but makes a very solid case as to why a critic does what they do. I give this only 3 stars [...]

    19. A bit of a drag in chapters, AO appears trying to work out for himself what his role as a critic is and its value. Failing towards relativism, the references and hand wringing are for the most part stimulating and provide good guides to the groundwork of his philosophy. Took me quite a while to finish, but a worthy read for those interested in the role of the critic, much more so than those interested in film.

    20. [Crossposted here from wordsandobjects/2017/01/1]There is a minor genre of books bemoaning the state of contemporary criticism. According to most of them, the “crisis” in criticism is internal or self-inflicted: it comes from critics who have lost interest in making judgments, or perhaps who only know how to make the wrong kinds of judgments. A. O. Scott’s Better Living Through Criticism is a departure from this narrative, but a vexing one. As a guide to understanding the material conditio [...]

    21. A ponderous and meandering (and as Scott would be the first to tell you, paradoxical and tautological) stumble through a history and ontology of art criticism. This is not exactly a book *about* criticism so much a book *of* criticism, the subject of which happens to be criticism. Let me clarify the distinction: rather than a pedagogical guide of how-to's and do's-and-don'ts for writers seeking to sharpen their skills of criticism, Better Living Through Criticism is an aesthetic literary respons [...]

    22. That I am trying to write a review of a book about criticism is not lost on me. There were parts of this that I really enjoyed (there are sections written in the form of a question and answer session) and parts of it that I enjoyed less than others. I tend to agree that well written criticism is a thing that society needs. Still the needle that always remains hard to thread, as someone who watches a lot of stuff, and reads a lot of stuff, is that people are always less thrilled by long descripti [...]

    23. For all his commentary on how essential argument is to criticism, the point of each essay is not communicated well (this could be a byproduct of the abstraction of most of the essays or a byproduct of the author's inherent unwillingness to make definitive statements). This became especially obvious to me in the dialogue chapters (in which the author imagines a dialogue with a critical version of himself) where he would make an assertion (e.g that his theory of taste is "grounded in spontaneous e [...]

    24. Because he’s a master of the mot juste and crafts such fine sentences, because of his intellectual benevolence and equitable reviews, A.O. Scott’s criticism rises to the level of literary art in my view. This book is no exception. As a fan of his work I was intrigued to read him grappling with abstractions about the very nature of that work, by analyzing diverse pieces such as Philip Larkin’s ‘Talking in Bed’, Teju Cole’s ‘Open City’ and the Pixar flick ‘Ratatouille’. Though [...]

    25. "As the book under review demonstrates so well, criticism is indeed an art, and one few carry out so elegantly. Even if you find yourself suspecting that Scott may be the most well-adjusted critic in Gotham and the neuroticism more performed than felt, it's an entertaining performance. Flagellating himself for his shallowness while writing with sensitivity and depth is a perfectly calibrated balancing act, and I only resent him the teensiest bit for the skill with which he pulls it off."–Laura [...]

    26. This is a masterpiece that is at once a poetic work of rich, provocative ideas as it is an exploration of criticism. And with it Scott shows himself to be a true man of letters as well as a philosopher. Don't listen to the naysayers who are denigrating this book for they just show themselves to be beneath it. The book should be approached in as much a playful way as it is with intelligence. This is a true gift for the ones who can appreciate it; the ones who can't are the swine looking at the pe [...]

    27. Of course it doesn't live up to its title (could anything, really?). Scott's defense of the discipline of criticism is descriptive and discursive. Interesting but not definitive. His argument - that we should embrace the critical process - is sound and his examples various and entertaining. Still, the book is less a guide of "how" to think about art, pleasure, beauty, and truth than a reminder that we "ought" to think about art, pleasure, etc.

    28. Having finished reading "Better Living Through Criticism" a few minutes ago, I am ready to start again, partly to savor every nuance, and partly to write a fair review. It touches on so many questions that I have asked myself over the years, and brings elegant resolution to a few of them, but, most importantly, it points out ways to think about them. It will never be a blockbuster, thankfully, but will always be a masterpiece.

    29. I'm a big fan of A.O. Scott's work and approach to film criticism, and I enjoyed this book. There were parts where he went so far down the rabbit hole that I was a bit lost, but that also explains why he's such a good critic. Scott can speak on a level that's easy to understand but has a lot more going on than just the basics about the movies.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *