The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2012

The Best American Science and Nature Writing The Best American Series First Best and Best SellingThe Best American series is the premier annual showcase for the country s finest short fiction and nonfiction Each volume s series editor selects

  • Title: The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2012
  • Author: Dan Ariely Tim Folger
  • ISBN: 9780547799537
  • Page: 157
  • Format: Paperback
  • The Best American Series First, Best, and Best SellingThe Best American series is the premier annual showcase for the country s finest short fiction and nonfiction Each volume s series editor selects notable works from hundreds of magazines, journals, and websites A special guest editor, a leading writer in the field, then chooses the best twenty or so pieces to publish.The Best American Series First, Best, and Best SellingThe Best American series is the premier annual showcase for the country s finest short fiction and nonfiction Each volume s series editor selects notable works from hundreds of magazines, journals, and websites A special guest editor, a leading writer in the field, then chooses the best twenty or so pieces to publish This unique system has made the Best American series the most respected and most popular of its kind.The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2012 includesJEROME GROOPMAN, SY MONTGOMERY, MICHAEL BEHAR, DEBORAH BLUM, THOMAS GOETZ, DAVID EAGLEMAN, RIVKA GALCHEN, DAVID KIRBY, and others

    One thought on “The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2012”

    1. The guest editor of the the 2012 volume of this series, Dan Ariely, lays out an interesting viewpoint in his introduction. His view of science is activist and centers on humanity, which makes sense since he’s a professor of psychology and behavioral economics. He writes that, for him, “ of the main goals for science in the years to come" is " figure out the human condition and design our environment to reduce our tendency for error and maximize our potential.” That affects his selections n [...]

    2. This book was utterly, completely fascinating. I can't recommend it enough. In case the title doesn't render it obvious, this is a collection of articles written on science and nature topics. Nearly all of it is written for a mainstream audience, so one need not be a scientist to comprehend the vast majority of it. (One article about quantum physics was over my head.) I will admit - some of the articles I half expected someone to pop out of the woodwork and ask me, "Really? You believed that? Yo [...]

    3. Worst Sci & Nat anthology ever. Some, or even many, of the articles would have been interesting to read by themselves, but they were all very "human-centric" shall we say, with lots of hubris. The first 1/2 of the book had so many mice experiments I started marking them in the margins. So stupid: what century do we live in? And who thinks experimenting on mice has any relevance to anything other than proving the sadism of the scientist? And then, in the Animal section huh, it was all about e [...]

    4. Wellis volume hits kind of a weird middle-space for me. Taken individually, the essays in this edition of Best Science and Nature Writing are good pieces of journalism. Six come from The New Yorker, three each from Scientific American, Wired, and National Geographic, two each from Outside, The Atlantic, and Discover, and singles from California Magazine, Popular Science, and Orion. But togethermehow they strike me as lacking in breadth, if that makes sense.After an introduction focusing in scien [...]

    5. This issue of the anthology was another good one. Not every article was fascinating but most were interesting. There was a very good piece about Svante Paabo and his work on Neanderthal DNA and another about Wallace J Nichols, who does ocean conservation by appealing to people’s emotions instead of reason. One article began with a story of a teenager in jail for driving 113 mph, which inspired the author to explore how and when the brain reaches full maturity. Another brain story looked at the [...]

    6. I can't get enough of these books. As always, a fascinating selection of articles. Learned about the science of crowd catastrophes, people who compete in Turing test competitions, human pheromones, and turning on certain genes in modern organisms to express ancestral traits. The most interesting piece had to be "The Brain on Trial", where David Eagleman dismantles free will and identity, showing how ambiguous and problematic it can be to make any sort of legal decision, and then discusses how we [...]

    7. Fascinating! I like the way this year's editor, Dan Ariely, arranged the stories from those dealing with very small subjects to those tackling progressively larger-scale topics. If this one has a main theme, I'd call it consciousness and cognition in their varied forms, from hive intelligence to human psychology and neuropsychiatry to machine learning and artificial intelligence.Highly recommended for anyone interested in the above topics, and what could be more interesting (I'm biased, being a [...]

    8. Three and a half stars, really. Consistently good writing but not consistently interesting to me, which is likely to happen with any collection of writing on science and nature. The essays that I enjoyed the most were the ones about octopuses and bitcoins.

    9. I did not enjoy this selection as much as those from previous years but there were still a lot of interesting articles.

    10. Of the two dozen stories, seven deserve special attention. Two articles deal with cities and urban phenomena. Three articles deal with the human brain, another with that of the octopus.Crush Point— Crowds as part of urban life.— Mob psychology, crowd surges, crowd management.The City Solution— What cities do well and right.— City dwellers tread lighter than their rural and suburban counterparts. — "Get the transportation right, then let things happen," said Peter Hall, planner and his [...]

    11. Ariely’s selections as Guest Editor for this 2012 Best American Series intrigue and electrify. Unfortunately, Ariely selected writing by three times as many men as women, which calls into question not the quality and quantity of science and nature writing by women today, but the objectivity of those in power in the field to publish and commend the best of it. The collection, arranged in six parts—Bacteria and Microorganisms, Animals, Humans (good and bad), Society and Environment, and Techno [...]

    12. Some thoughts. My computer has been broken for two or more months so I've been doing all my entries on a smart phone, which is a pain. So now it's fixed and I'm still typing on a phone I had to go out of town the week before Christmas and had three days to get my act together before the day. Had a real nice visit with friends on the day, but on the two hour drive home I realized I was sick. The point of this is I had little time to read on my trip and too disoriented while sick to focus on a pag [...]

    13. I love this series, but this edition was disappointing. It's simply wandering too far from its roots. When the first edition of The Best American SCIENCE AND NATURE Writing came out in 2000, David Quammen was the guest editor – an actual “science and nature writer”. The next year it was E.O. Wilson. Close enough. But the farther they get from the original hatching of the idea, the farther the guest editors get from the science and nature writing theme. This year? Dan Ariely, a behavioral e [...]

    14. Best American Science and Nature Writing 2012 gets a three out of five, and not more, because I don't think many of the pieces were that memorable. That might say more about my memory rather than the editors' selection, so take this review however you'd like. Some of the pieces I do remember that were fascinating were the following:This whole "bitcoin" thing, where an anonymous guy made his own currency online and then got people interested in investing in it raises all sorts of new questions ab [...]

    15. "It was the best of the series; it was the worst of the series." I have enjoyed this series for years. It features a guest editor, a prominent science writer or scientist who writes for the general public, who picks his or her of the science articles from publications for the general reader, under the general direction of the series editor, Tim Folger. It normally includes a very broad selection of topics in science and nature.This year Dan Ariely broke with tradition and has organized his selec [...]

    16. As with all such collections of essays, even "Best ofs", there are those that will strike your fancy and those that won't. A distinct lack of astronomy for those interested in those topics.My favorite pieces involved:1) An overview of eczema2) The intelligence of octopi3) Our increasing knowledge of brain chemistry and how this impacts the law4) The science of crowd behavior dynamics5) The Turing TestThe other essays dealt with:1) Bacteria in the body2) The rise of childhood allergies3) The hist [...]

    17. The majority of the individual pieces are pretty well-written and a handful of them quite intriguing. However, they don't stick together well as a compilation, making them less gripping in a book format. My primary expectation from this book was to have a good overview about different "sizzling" current topics and my hope was that good writing would make this process enjoyable. However, with the general disconnect between topics, it failed to sustain my interest. I could not gather much when I t [...]

    18. First I need to state that I didn't read every essay in this collection. I spent the past few months skipping around and only reading the ones that caught my interest, so I find it very difficult to rate this collection as a whole. Some of the ones that stand out in my memory include The Peanut Puzzle by Jerome Groopman andThe Long, Curious, Extravagant Evolution of Feathers by Carl Zimmer, but by far the best essay in this collection was Deep Intellect, by Sy Montgomery. If I was rating the ent [...]

    19. I look forward to this collection every year and as usual, 2012 does not disappoint. Recommended wholeheartedly.*Viewed from the perspective of most of its inhabitants, your body is not so much the temple and vessel of the human soul as it is a complex ambulatory feeding mechanism for a methane reactor in your small intestine.* Brendan Buhler, The Teeming Metropolis of You*Then she went to college and landed her first "real" job: ridgidly procedural data entry. She thought back longinly to her b [...]

    20. I actually like the writing and would give it 4 stars but the ebook is poorly constructed so that it can't be read in "night mode." In night mode, every page is blank. I think the problem is that they are "hardcoding" the font color to be black so that then if the reader changes the background to black, everything disappears.It is equivalent to buying a paperback book and finding out that the pages are printed such that they can't be read outdoors. Sure, the author and publisher should be allowe [...]

    21. I don't read this series regularly, but I'm glad I picked this one up. The stories are organized into six sections (bacteria/microorganisms, animals, humans (the good), humans (the bad), society and environment, technology). I thought the stories about links between the bacteria that live in/on us and our health were the most interesting, but there's something in there for everyone (and Eagleman's article on how to deal with how understanding the brain (i.e the mind) complicates legal definition [...]

    22. I love the Best American Science and Nature series. The articles they choose are almost always fascinating. Sometimes the science is a little suspicious, but as quick entertaining bits before bed they cannot be beaten. In this volume, the only story that I thought was a dud was the story on nano-Computers. Other than that there is Vat Meat, the food obsessed former Microsoft guy and his 1000000 page book on molecular gastronomy, a guy trying to reverse engineer a dinosaur from chickens, and all [...]

    23. I really enjoyed most of the science articles in this collection, but it was clear that Dan Ariely's personal interests in behavioral economics heavily influenced which articles he chose to include in this book. At first, I was a little bothered by that. I felt ripped off because none of the articles in the book discussed an issue relating to astronomy, an area of science that I find fascinating. But as I continued to read the various articles, I realized that each one had something very importa [...]

    24. I continue to enjoy this series because the articles don't focus on one particular area of science. This particular collection was light on the nature side, but it includes some interesting sections on microorganisms and computers. Although I am no closer to understanding quantum computers than I was before I read "Dream Machines," other articles always compensate for those that don't pique my interest. The final article of this collection (about artificial intelligence) was one of the best, so [...]

    25. This got recalled before I could finish it, but I've been skipping around in here and really enjoying every thing I've read so far. There is a diverse assortment of material in here, but the writing is consistently exceptional.Picked this back up. "Deep Intellect" by Sy Montgomery was absolutely fascinating. I really enjoyed everything in here on animals, from ants to meat to creating a dinosaur from a chicken. Great selection. I look forward to reading more from this series.

    26. As usual, a series of fun and informative essays spanning the last year in science. These tended more towards human-centric stuff (Ariely's bent, as a social scientist), with some of the essays being no more than profiles of prominent scientists (interesting as they were!). As a social scientist and familiar with Ariely's work, I actually felt like I didn't learn too much with this collection. But it did push me a bit, and it was just plain interesting overall.

    27. I appreciate the exposure to recent science journalism, and particularly enjoyed learning about bitcoins, the Loebner Prize, and the comeback of urbanization partly in response to concerns about carbon footprint. A strong finish. The book also had a strong start, with the first sentence of the first essay: "You are mostly not you." But I think I would get more out of reading some of the honest-to-god books written by the likes of Dawkins, McPhee, Gould, and Wilson.

    28. I didn't enjoy this collection of essays as much as other volumes. With the exception of the last few essays, I felt like the collection had a very specific, narrow point of view, a mix of politics and philosophy, that it kept forcing onto the reader. The essays themselves weren't particularly well-written or engaging. The last few essays (e.g. Mad Science and Crypto-currency) were closer to what I expected for the entire volume: engaging, quirky, and informative.

    29. It might be a recency effect, but I found the last few articles especially gripping. Some of my favorites were Dream Machine by Galchen, Cryptocurrency by Davis, Mind vs. Machine by Christian. Others include Crush Point by Seabrook, Feedback Loop by Goetz, Touchy Feely Method of Wallace J. Nichols by Roberts, and Ants and the Art of War by Moffett.Overall, this edition was quite eclectic; great for those who like to read about interesting obscurities.

    30. Aside from David Eagleman's utterly creepy article on brain development in, for instance, mass killers and a couple of others about our body's bacterial ecosystems nothing here that was particularly memorable---though the general quality of the writing and thinking seemed above average. It is notable, I think, to see how many of the entries came from the New Yorker rather than a science or tech magazine.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *